-
BRKZ Secures $31 Million to Scale AI-Enabled Building Materials Procurement Across Saudi Arabia and the GCC - 2 days ago
-
ANDREW INGREDIENTS STREAMLINES TRANSPORT AND WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT WITH POCKET BOX FLEET - September 9, 2026
-
BIRDIE FORTESCUE CHOOSES TO PARTNER WITH PROLOG - September 7, 2026
-
REWE elevates supply chain reliability with Cimcorp’s Success Services - September 3, 2026
-
How to swerve the Emissions Trading hit - September 1, 2026
-
Hai Robotics’ HaiPick Climb Reaches 10,000-Robot Milestone Across Global Customer Projects - September 1, 2026
-
Nulogy to showcase Smart Factory and Quality & Compliance solutions at PPMA 2026 - August 27, 2026
-
ENTERPRISE FLEX-E-RENT TARGETS FLEET DIGITISATION INNOVATION WITH SURECAM PARTNERSHIP - August 27, 2026
-
PROLOG FURTHER STRENGTHENS COMMERCIAL TEAM WITH APPOINTMENT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER - August 25, 2026
-
GOPLASTICPALLETS.COM LAUNCHES UK’S LIGHTEST EURO PLASTICPALLET TO BOOST EXPORT EFFICIENCY - August 19, 2026
Freight Forwarders Warned Not To Expect Compensation For Felixstowe Disruption.
Freight forwarders that suffered operational damage and incurred significant additional costs as a result of the disruption to operations at the UK port of Felixstowe following the introduction of a new operating system in June have been warned that they are unlikely to receive any compensation from the port’s owners.
Robert Keen, Director General of the British International Freight Association (BIFA) said:
“Having had a meeting with the port’s senior management, it is clear that the only companies that might receive any compensation are shipping lines.
“The port authority has made it clear to us that it does not consider BIFA members to be direct customers of the port, and would not be willing to have a discussion about possible compensation for the damage caused and the increased costs that have been incurred by those members.
“It is astonishing that a port authority, which owns the UK’s busiest container port and has been happy to market it as the ‘Port of Britain’, implemented a new and vitally important system with apparently no fall-back position if it went wrong.
“And it is very disappointing that it is not even prepared to discuss any kind of compensation for such a failure in customer service.”











