-
Scurri expands international delivery network with the addition of new Latin American carriers to power global eCommerce growth. - 1 day ago
-
Toyota’s new customer portal will transform forklift fleet management - November 10, 2025
-
Seven key trends set to impact material handling in 2026 - November 10, 2025
-
TRAK GLOBAL SECURITY SOLUTIONS TARGETS STOLEN VEHICLE AND CARGO RECOVERY INNOVATION WITH QUECLINK PARTNERSHIP - November 10, 2025
-
mimic robotics raises $16 million to deploy frontier physical AI across industries - November 4, 2025
-
SMART BOLT-SEAL INNOVATION FROM QUECLINK TO ENHANCE CONTAINER SECURITY - October 31, 2025
-
Ecommerce retailer Gardening Naturally boosts order fulfilment efficiency by 3,500% and triples revenue since using Forterro’s Orderwise - October 30, 2025
-
BRAND CREATIONS GROUP PARTNERS WITH PROLOG FULFILMENT AS PART OF ITS UK GROWTH STRATEGY - October 23, 2025
-
DERRY BROS SIMPLIFIES UK-IRISH TRADE FOR FULFILMENT PROVIDERS WITH DEDICATED CUSTOMS SOLUTION - October 22, 2025
-
One World Group partners with Scurri to supercharge its UK ecommerce logistics with global omnichannel solutions - October 16, 2025
Freight Forwarders Warned Not To Expect Compensation For Felixstowe Disruption.
Freight forwarders that suffered operational damage and incurred significant additional costs as a result of the disruption to operations at the UK port of Felixstowe following the introduction of a new operating system in June have been warned that they are unlikely to receive any compensation from the port’s owners.
Robert Keen, Director General of the British International Freight Association (BIFA) said:
“Having had a meeting with the port’s senior management, it is clear that the only companies that might receive any compensation are shipping lines.
“The port authority has made it clear to us that it does not consider BIFA members to be direct customers of the port, and would not be willing to have a discussion about possible compensation for the damage caused and the increased costs that have been incurred by those members.
“It is astonishing that a port authority, which owns the UK’s busiest container port and has been happy to market it as the ‘Port of Britain’, implemented a new and vitally important system with apparently no fall-back position if it went wrong.
“And it is very disappointing that it is not even prepared to discuss any kind of compensation for such a failure in customer service.”












