-
Mstack launches Chemstack AI – a revolutionary AI-led R&D platform; achieves 10x revenue growth as chemical industry faces supply chain crisis - 2 days ago
-
PROLOG FULFILMENT APPOINTS NEW SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER TO DRIVE OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE - September 24, 2025
-
SURECAM TEAMS UP WITH ENTERPRISE MOBILITY TO SHOWCASE VIDEO TELEMATICS INNOVATION - September 24, 2025
-
HAULIERS URGED TO STAY FOCUSED ON ICS2 CUSTOMS CHANGES DESPITE DELAYS - September 23, 2025
-
GOPLASTICPALLETS.COM LAUNCHES NEW FREEZER SPACERS TO HELP FOOD MANUFACTURERS BOOST COLD CHAIN EFFICIENCY - September 23, 2025
-
Westexe Takes Centre Stage to Scoop Prestigious Archies Award - September 22, 2025
-
Jungheinrich scores A* in supporting educational resources supplier’s zero-carbon journey - September 22, 2025
-
RITE-HITE EXPANDS VEHICLE RESTRAINT PORTFOLIO WITH NEW USER-FRIENDLY MANUAL ERGONOMIC WHEEL-LOK - September 17, 2025
-
Simmi London steps up delivery experience with Scurri Connect - September 17, 2025
-
Rebecca Smith to bring fresh perspective to UKMHA Board After Exciting Appointment - September 17, 2025
Freight Forwarders Warned Not To Expect Compensation For Felixstowe Disruption.
Freight forwarders that suffered operational damage and incurred significant additional costs as a result of the disruption to operations at the UK port of Felixstowe following the introduction of a new operating system in June have been warned that they are unlikely to receive any compensation from the port’s owners.
Robert Keen, Director General of the British International Freight Association (BIFA) said:
“Having had a meeting with the port’s senior management, it is clear that the only companies that might receive any compensation are shipping lines.
“The port authority has made it clear to us that it does not consider BIFA members to be direct customers of the port, and would not be willing to have a discussion about possible compensation for the damage caused and the increased costs that have been incurred by those members.
“It is astonishing that a port authority, which owns the UK’s busiest container port and has been happy to market it as the ‘Port of Britain’, implemented a new and vitally important system with apparently no fall-back position if it went wrong.
“And it is very disappointing that it is not even prepared to discuss any kind of compensation for such a failure in customer service.”