-
Mstack launches Chemstack AI – a revolutionary AI-led R&D platform; achieves 10x revenue growth as chemical industry faces supply chain crisis - 2 days ago
-
PROLOG FULFILMENT APPOINTS NEW SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER TO DRIVE OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE - September 24, 2025
-
SURECAM TEAMS UP WITH ENTERPRISE MOBILITY TO SHOWCASE VIDEO TELEMATICS INNOVATION - September 24, 2025
-
HAULIERS URGED TO STAY FOCUSED ON ICS2 CUSTOMS CHANGES DESPITE DELAYS - September 23, 2025
-
GOPLASTICPALLETS.COM LAUNCHES NEW FREEZER SPACERS TO HELP FOOD MANUFACTURERS BOOST COLD CHAIN EFFICIENCY - September 23, 2025
-
Westexe Takes Centre Stage to Scoop Prestigious Archies Award - September 22, 2025
-
Jungheinrich scores A* in supporting educational resources supplier’s zero-carbon journey - September 22, 2025
-
RITE-HITE EXPANDS VEHICLE RESTRAINT PORTFOLIO WITH NEW USER-FRIENDLY MANUAL ERGONOMIC WHEEL-LOK - September 17, 2025
-
Simmi London steps up delivery experience with Scurri Connect - September 17, 2025
-
Rebecca Smith to bring fresh perspective to UKMHA Board After Exciting Appointment - September 17, 2025
Pay tribunal ruling will drive even greater uptake of automated handling technology, say Rainbow Dynamics
According to UK-based robotic and automated materials handling solutions specialist Rainbow Dynamics, the economic case for automating the key processes within a typical warehouse or fulfilment centre has been made even more compelling following the recent ruling that high street retailer Next must pay its shop assistants the same rate as its warehouse workers.
More than 3,500 current and former Next employees had claimed that store staff, who are predominantly women, should not be paid at a lower rate than warehouse workers – over half of whom are men. The Next staff contended that better-paid warehouse jobs are more likely to be filled by men due to the physical demands of the work. This, they argued, puts women at a disadvantage.
In its defence Next said that the different rates of pay between its warehouse and retail staff were justified because warehouse personnel command higher salaries than shop workers across the labour market.
But the retailer’s argument was rejected by a pay tribunal – a decision that it is reported is likely to cost the company in the region of £30 million in back pay.
Frazer Watson, Vice President of Rainbow Dynamics, believes that the ruling is likely to add to the already significant recruitment issues that the supply chain sector has been wrestling with for some time.
Frazer Watson says: “One of the ways that logistics companies and own account warehouse operators have tried to tackle the labour crisis that has existed since Brexit has been to offer increasingly attractive rates of pay in order to draw in the workers needed to run their facilities.”
He continues: “But this ruling means that if a retailer or its logistics services partner decides to seek extra warehouse staff by raising pay, the retailer must also offer its shop assistants the same deal. So, not only is the retailer’s wage bill increased but if it is possible to earn the same amount by working in the relative comfort of a high street shop as it is in a warehouse which, as everyone knows can be cold, dark and sometimes dangerous places, the already tough task of recruiting warehouse personnel will be even more difficult.
“In my opinion, this verdict can only accelerate the trend we are seeing across the logistics sector for companies to introduce automated and robotic solutions as a way of mitigating the problems associated with recruiting suitable personnel and the high cost of labour.”
Workers at five of the UK’s largest supermarkets, Asda, Tesco, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s and the Co-op, are reported to be pursuing similar equal pay cases.
With its head office in Lancashire, Rainbow Dynamics designs and builds a suite of sustainable robotic load handing and automated parcel sortation solutions for logistics warehouses, post and parcel handling facilities, manufacturing sites and e-commerce fulfilment centers.